Denise (
denise) wrote in
dw_maintenance2022-03-18 06:34 pm
Friday import update
We have managed to chug through every single outstanding "things broke because there were too many comments/something in the data feed was busted/we have no idea why it broke but it runs okay when we run it manually" import that people alerted us to, and the import queue has been holding steadily at 0 for the last 24 hours (ie, jobs are finishing pretty much as soon as they're scheduled), so we've cut back the extra resources we diverted to the importer for this week. If you noticed a brief blip (like 30 seconds) of the site giving 502 errors, that was us fiddling with the memory allocation and the databases again!
We thought we'd figured out the underlying cause of why imports with a large number of comments were failing, but every time we've thought we solved the thing that would fix it, it's turned out the actual issue is down one layer of abstraction. We're still working on figuring that one out. Yes, it's driving us up the wall. We're sorry! We will let you know when people can do large imports again. (If it turns out after we find and fix whatever bug is causing the problem that we also need extra memory for those to succeed, we'll throw that extra memory at it for another few days at that point so people can have another window to import their larger accounts without the job running out of memory -- we just have to turn it back down for a while because it is more expensive to provision that much memory and we don't have the budget to do so indefinitely, especially if it's not being used like it isn't right now. But a few days is not a problem.)
Thank you again to everyone who's been so patient with us this week. We really, really appreciate it.
We thought we'd figured out the underlying cause of why imports with a large number of comments were failing, but every time we've thought we solved the thing that would fix it, it's turned out the actual issue is down one layer of abstraction. We're still working on figuring that one out. Yes, it's driving us up the wall. We're sorry! We will let you know when people can do large imports again. (If it turns out after we find and fix whatever bug is causing the problem that we also need extra memory for those to succeed, we'll throw that extra memory at it for another few days at that point so people can have another window to import their larger accounts without the job running out of memory -- we just have to turn it back down for a while because it is more expensive to provision that much memory and we don't have the budget to do so indefinitely, especially if it's not being used like it isn't right now. But a few days is not a problem.)
Thank you again to everyone who's been so patient with us this week. We really, really appreciate it.

no subject
no subject
Thank you
--
А.Кац и Я
Layers
Re: Layers
Re: Layers
Re: Layers
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
And yeah, it's really nice to have finally proven I was right in those old arguments I used to have with the former CEO of Six Apart about how people would respond so much better to us if he'd just let me write a goddamn fucking news post in which I sounded like an actual human being as opposed to a robot that had been programmed to spew marketing talking points. I mean, it's a total Pyrrhic victory, and he'll never know I was right, but I was right, goddammit.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
Decentralising things rocks!
no subject
no subject
no subject
I didn't have anything to import (I flounced from LJ years ago and deleted everything before I knew there was an importer here), but I just wanted to say thank you to the development team. The care and attention you give to the users of this site, and your dedication to improving and maintaining site functionality and user experience overall, has been so refreshing compared to some other social media sites. I really appreciate all the hard work you and everyone has put into DreamWidth.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
I made few attempts of import of my journal from LJ in the past but they all failed.
But today I've finally done it and closed my account there.
I'm considering paid account in DW now.
no subject
no subject
no subject
Question for the community.
Our archive at Live Journal is huge. We have 50-60 posts a month with lots of comments, and we go back to 2006. Does the community think an import that large would be feasible?
My other question concerns the posters and commenters. Since they would not have an ID on Dreamwidth, how would the entries and the comments come out?
Thanks for any help you can give.
Re: Question for the community.
2. Comments and community entries are imported as attributed to the original poster's LiveJournal account using OpenID, a protocol that lets you log into one site using another site's account. People who posted them can log into DW with their LiveJournal URL and continue to manage the content, or they can create a Dreamwidth account and "claim" their LiveJournal URL to have the comments and entries update to belong to the Dreamwidth account instead. I explained it a bit more at the bottom of this entry.
Re: Question for the community.
The archive would definitely be nice to have, since LJ may disappear at any time.
Thank you!
no subject
That being said, thank you so much for working on the importing feature! The entirety of my college experience from 2003-2007 and the years immediately following are on that old LJ account, and the entries and conversations I had with my friends are very dear to me. I'm so thankful that I've at least been able to archive the entries themselves so far!
no subject
no subject
Thank you so much for responding; I really appreciate it.
no subject
no subject
no subject
I have a question about claiming OpenID. I have imported my comms to DW and I can see that most people have claimed their OpenIDs (including me), but the ones that haven't all are people with underscores in their names.
The FAQ for claiming OpenID says that underscores might be a problem, but the FAQ post is from 2015, so I'm not sure if it's still accurate. I didn't want to open a support request for this either, since I'm not actually personally affected.
So: is this still a problem, and could you maybe think about fixing it so that my comm members with "unfortunate" names can also claim their OpenIDs?
no subject
no subject
I assume you could probably manually set the claim for someone if they asked support (and could prove they have the right to claim it), but I'll leave that up to them.
no subject
no subject
Running another import does not create duplicate entries, only fills in any missing ones.
You said this in one of your comments above, and it made me wonder - I'd like to update an import of a comm that I run, but I don't want to risk losing the successful import from a few weeks ago. Your comment makes it look like the old import wouldn't be lost though - it would just add the new entries. Is that right, or am I just being hopeful?!
no subject