Code push happening shortly!

[mark]

Hi all, I'm about to kick off the latest code push, bringing live updates and tweaks to keep improving Dreamwidth! As always, we welcome your feedback in the comments.

For the information on what's going live, check out: https://dw-dev.dreamwidth.org/223659.html

Screening Comments for the night

Hi all!

I need to step away from the computer from the evening so I'm going to turn on comment screening. I think by this point we've gotten more than enough useful feedback and it's mostly just repetition on a theme here.

And, this is your once-in-a-while reminder that discourse in our public communities must remain civil. A number of these comments are getting pretty close to the line of what we consider acceptable, and we will moderate it if we need to.

Please respect that most of the people who work on Dreamwidth are volunteers and we're all well-intentioned. You should definitely assume good faith. We love to hear about your experience, but please do stay away from the invective and brigading.

Until tomorrow! -Mark

A Comment on Font Sizes

Hi all! Since this seems to be the overriding theme of many comments, I'm going to put a response at the top here instead of trying to reply to everybody.

First, the font size changes are generally intentional, and to a large degree, here to stay officially (but there are some userstyle options!) -- but please hang on to the pitchforks and let's talk about why.

Dreamwidth was started over a decade ago, and was based on LiveJournal which is over two decades old at this point. Back then, most people were building web sites for desktop PCs, on 15" CRTs that ran 1024x768 if you were lucky, and we had no idea what it meant to make something accessible. Or, well, most of us didn't.

In the intervening 20 years, a lot of things have changed. The way people access Dreamwidth has gone mobile (50% of our traffic is iOS/Android!), the types of systems people use is very different, the technologies our development staff know are different, and our understanding of how to build accessible web sites is much, much better.

So, as we've been thinking about how to continue developing Dreamwidth, we've been using that knowledge to inform the decisions we make. We want Dreamwidth to hold true to the things that we believe (transparency, no ads, etc), but we have been taking the lessons learned by the broader industry over the intervening bunch of years and applying them when it makes sense.

Specifically when it comes to font size, there are now many studies that show that 16px fonts are the minimum you should use to cover the widest range of visual needs. No, it's not perfect; much like small text has problems for many users, larger text does pose problems for some of you. I definitely am aware of that, and to those who are negatively impacted by this change, I'm sorry.

There are some options, however; you can apply userstyles to Dreamwidth in most browsers, which can adjust the font size back down. momijizukamori has volunteered to create an example that you can use, similar to the Widescreen userstyle, and then that should help anybody who really wants the smaller fonts: quick and dirty userstyle here.

As a second option, you can temporarily disable the changes: navigate to our beta features management page and click Turn ON beta testing for the option Temporarily revert updated journal page components.

As it says in the name, this is temporary, but if you critically need to turn this off for now -- you can do that. We expect to have this temporary disable for the next few months while we fix up any of the issues reported today, particularly the ones that make stuff look really weird (like the mobile half-width situation).

For closing, please do watch this community and the dw_beta community. We posted about these changes and asked people to help us build them two months ago when we released them for beta testing. If you want to be part of the iteration on Dreamwidth, and have a voice in the things we build & what they look like, please join us and be part of the process!

But even if you don't, your feedback here is welcome, we hear it, and we will continue to iterate with it in mind. Our foremost goal here is to make Dreamwidth better for as many people as we can -- and this is part of the process. Bumps and all :)

Known Issues

• Some Celerity colors/spacing has changed. I don't think this was expected, so we'll take a look.
• <table>, <td>, and <div> tags unintentionally changed in styling -- looks like we're leaking the styling changes we made in the main scheme down. I think we can fix this -- please don't edit all your tables!
• Spacing and coloring around the page number sections on many-commented entries no longer is offset in a darker colored box.
• Some mobile browsers are reporting a half-width page (half the page width is the comment, the other half is empty). We're looking.

Fixed Issues

• Unexpectedly bright colors in Tropo-Purple. We'll take a look, and see if we can tone it back down! (Weirdly, the purple you're seeing now is how it was originally designed to look, but due to a bug, the color was wrong... we fixed the bug, for unrelated reasons, but we can also adjust the color!)
• Emailed comments are getting squashed and losing paragraph breaks.
• Icon browser sometimes showing keywords even in no text mode. This is intentional for the icon that you have selected, so you can see what the keyword is. What do you think?
• The Widescreen user-style is broken. To fix this, please add this to the end of your style:

#content, #content > div:nth-child(2), #content > div:nth-child(1), #masthead > div:nth-child(1), #account-links-wrapper, footer {
   max-width: 100%;
}
   

In case of the worst, please keep an eye on dreamwidth for updates.

Comments

[scythiandy]

Posting links to show what I mean, but my page has gone from this: Before
to this: After

In addition to how the comment for replies look and the searingly bright purple now, which isn't how the color coding for this layout (trophispherical purple) used to look, it's not a pleasant thing to look at. It's taking up a lot of space on my screen just for a reply box. Everything's hugely bigger.

Edit: To add to this, please go look at rpanons on this setting and see how utterly horrible and disjointed it looks. It's a pain to see that comm now.

[amberblaze]

I'm on Trophispherical Purple and the colors are entirely too bright now. It's kind of hard to look at.

[proofofconcept]

I'm also getting some of this weird sizing mentioned in the first comment. Everything is big on some entries; on others (like this one) it's fine. (Using Gradation horizontal.)

[lylith_st]

Alas, seems like the code push broke DW for Widescreen. Everything looks giant on my end and other friends of mine had reported having the same issue.

If anyone knows a way to fix it, it will be greatly appreciated.

[peaked]

I'm on the purple, too, and I'm glad you've mentioned this. I think if it can be toned down a little (I think the white background is what's too bright), that'd be great! The purple one is my favourite scheme to use.

[telly]

In Celerity, the comment headers are grey instead of green and there's a weird gap in the left margin between comments and the sidebar? I don't even see Celerity mentioned in the beta page.

[amberblaze]

Agreed! I like the purple one best, too.

[proofofconcept]

(i looked again, correction: everything seems to be big using the site skin on any entry. site skin is normal elsewhere on the site. this was also true when i tried gradation vertical.)

[teal]

Not sure if it happened with the Widescreen Break, but choosing icons from the "Browse" menu is incredibly clunky and huge now. Along with everything else that is now obnoxiously huge and imo ugly to look at.

[skittering]

Everything is much bigger in a... non-aesthetically-pleasing way, though I'm able to remedy it some by taking my browser zoom down to 80%.

An actual issue: The notifications I'm getting in my inbox show others' replies as all one big lump of text, not reflecting paragraph spacing like it used to. This makes it super hard to read. :x

[winscenario]

Everything is ridiculously huge, comments and reply boxes take up way too much space on screen. I get wanting to add in the option for bigger font but is there no way at all you could've added an option for users to choose between the two options, rather than just benefiting a handful to the detriment of the majority?

[withmeinparadise]

Wanted to let you know I love how big the icon picker is now! Not wild about the size of everything else, but this is a convenient change for me. :)

[telly]

Also the right margin is like halfway across the page, instead of text continuing to fill the entire screen (although I'm at 80% zoom, probably a factor)

[knifecollecting]

Yeah, everything feels REALLY BIG but REALLY CLOSE TOGETHER on comment pages and the Browse menu just feels uneven and too big.

[fearinahandfulof]

I'm using the Celerity site skin, and I've suddenly got a bunch of white space on the right - I think it's around a third of my monitor screen. I'm on desktop, FWIW. And yeah, the comment headers are grey now.

[Edit: screenshot]

[mark]

Feedback is welcome, but let's be careful about throwing around arguments about the handfuls and the majorities, please!

[ravenna]

oof, that sizing is not aesthetically pleasing. i do understand if it's going to mostly stay, since i can see that having one skin that works on mobile and desktop is beneficial, HOWEVER -

a) +1 the purple skin burns now ow ow

b) would it be possible to make the font size for the Entry tags: line smaller? now posts that have more than a couple tags have a massive honking chunk wall of text and it's really awkward.

[fearinahandfulof]

I'm not zooming the page and I'm getting this too.

[prospitian]

i think maybe some of the default settings for divs got changed in a way that affected a bunch of custom code/layouts i had set up? best example i have offhand is this one, which looked like this and has become this (screenshot). i'm on the latest version of firefox on windows btw!

i imagine the solution if this is permanent and intentional is to manually override the background and border, but i admit i'm hhhoping this wasn't supposed to be universal because that's a lot to fix for all my used and distributed codes...

i do actually like how wide the site is on desktop though! it'll take some adjusting to but i especially think it'll make the collapse of long threads more bearable.

[mark]

Yeah, the links are definitely much brighter. Oddly, I think this is due to us fixing a bug, and not intentionally changing the color. We'll take a look!

[winscenario]

Alright, I apologize for that. At the very least from the people I've been talking to or seeing comments around, only two, perhaps three, people said they preferred the bigger font/spacing. I just wondered if there was no way to make this change optional, is all!

[mark]

When you say widescreen, what do you mean? Can you perhaps provide a screenshot to something that looks wrong/different?

[shipoutofluck]

other than the issues people have already mentioned re: the size of everything (it's.... big.......),

when I use tables now there's like... a white background? like, uh, so? that white box behind my stuff was not there before and it's seeming consistent with all my table use I can find.

(in general the code of several of my things is not liking this update but the tables thing is what I'm focusing on right now)

if this is intentional, that's.... ngl very distracting especially as someone who uses a lot of tables in my codes for numerous posts across a lot of journals and basically breaks a lot of stuff I use constantly.

[mark]

Oh interesting, this is probably related to some Markdown formatting changes we made. We'll take a look, thank you!

[empires_heir]

I had to log into one of my paids to check this, and I'm +1 to this - it's back to how it was the last code push or the one before where I can actually see what icon I'm picking instead of 1/3rd or 1/4th size.