fu (
fu) wrote in
dw_maintenance2011-04-20 11:42 am
Code push done
Code push done! Let us know if you run into any problems.
And if you're doing beta-testing /
dw_beta, take note that we've added thread expand/collapse and cuttag expansion.
And if you're doing beta-testing /

no subject
no subject
ETA:
Got it!
change this in your custom CSS:
.has-userpic .headerto:
.has-userpic .entry .header, .has-userpic .comment .headerThough -- we've added a couple things lately to Transmogrified, including the ability to toggle left/right icons with one click, so it might be easier to just remove that CSS, go to http://www.dreamwidth.org/customize/options, and change "Place icons on left or right of entry " to left.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
Go to http://www.dreamwidth.org/customize/options?group=customcss and remove all the CSS in the textarea there.
Then go to http://www.dreamwidth.org/customize/options and change "Place icons on left or right of entry " to left, and that should do the trick!
no subject
no subject
no subject
Some of posted normal today. Yesterday the calvin and hobbes feed repeated over and over. I had to go back 100 entries before the chain was broken and then it starts again. There is definitely something wrong with the calvin and hobbes feed.
no subject
no subject
Edit: β¦actually, I wonder if this is my style. I had to copy and modify some of the S2 from Tabula Rasa. I should check on that.
Further Edit: No; also shows up with with style=site, style=light, and style=original (on a scans_daily post, because that's where I know I can find long comment threads).
Yet Further Edit: It's been figured out.
no subject
no subject
Noticed it was due to an icon size change on http://www.dreamwidth.org/customize/options?group=presentation that was defaulted to small instead of full. Definitely don't recommend this behavior to automatically change all layouts. That's popping people's 100px default icons down to 75px without them changing it for themselves.
no subject
(Also, what layout are you using?)
no subject
edit; I pretty much never visit the poor http://www.dreamwidth.org/customize/options page except to jet to the CSS box. :3
I gave
no subject
Brittle and Bases both had CSS to resize icons down to 80px maximum as part of their design. When we put in the option to resize userpics (both so people using Brittle/Bases could size userpics up, and people not using Brittle/Bases could size them down) we defaulted those two layouts to 'small' (75x75px) instead of full size, since the display was already roughly there already and we wanted to make the least disruptive change possible. (If you'd modified your layout's CSS heavily, it's likely you had something in there to override the icon sizing, which is why you in particular noticed.)
All the other layouts default to full.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
Also, the jquery cut tag expander behaves a little differently; this css
.cuttag-open {
border: 1px dashed black;
margin: 0.5em;
padding: 0.5em;
background: #ccc;
}
affects the background of the cut text with the non-jquery expander, but with the new one the style is applied just to the expander image.
The beta comment expander doesn't handle multiply-nested expand calls properly. So if you expand a set of comments, but there are comments nested far enough down that there are still unexpanded comments under the original one, then after that the further nested comments can only be expanded one at a time.
(I'm mostly just talking to myself here, I think. :) )
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
(If you really need to see the page, you can go to http://www.dreamwidth.org/customize/options?group=display)
no subject
no subject
no subject
I see the same effect when I make a sample HTML page with the embed code I got from another YouTube video -- my guess is it has to do with whatever YouTube is doing to its iframes to resize it, not playing nicely with iOS devices.
cuttag expansion module
Hello, dreamwidth coders, is it possible to make the new cuttag expansion module optional, or to turn it into a footer, like the other modules? Barring that, is there some CSS code I could add to the custom CSS window to hide the module, as I won't be using it in the immediate future?
In any case, thank you for such a great blogging platform : )
Re: cuttag expansion module
Re: cuttag expansion module
Hi, Denise, I am not making this up, but I don't have a "Cut Tag Controls" option in the Modules section of the Customize Journal Style page. I was mortified when I read your reply because I had looked there first before posting. I had also looked at my stylesheet, and although any kind of coding is utterly Greek to me, I found neither hide nor hair of anything that might remotely have to do with cut tags. Tags, yes, cut tags, no.
So I followed the link you posted in your reply, and I swear, I got nothing. I have, under Header, Navigation. Under Sidebar I have Basic Journal Info, Calendar, Page Summary, Tags (limit display, type of tags - i.e. list, multilevel, cloud), Link List, Syndication, Time Loaded, Custom Text, Style Credit and Search. Then under Footer I have Powered By. That's it. I clicked 'expand all' just in case. And also cleared my cache.
So right now I'm going "Que?" like Manuel in Fawlty Towers. Dude, what am I doing wrong?
Dunno if it helps, but the layout is Transmogrified, it's a free account, and I'm using Safari 5.0.5 : )
Re: cuttag expansion module
Re: cuttag expansion module
Oh, that's all right, then. I'm much relieved. Thought I was being even more dense than usual.
Thank you again for Dreamwidth. I love the clean and intuitive interface : )
Re: cuttag expansion module
Re: cuttag expansion module
You did! I do see it, and I've used it! \o/
Many thanks, fu : )
no subject
I'm using Stepping Stones with a custom colour theme, and my only custom CSS is "#title, #subtitle, #pagetitle { display: none; }"; removing it didn't change the icon locations. The misalignment shows in both Firefox (v3.6) and RealPlayer.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject