Was the shrinkage of some of the text on the profile page intentional? The text just to the right of my icon (everything from "Free Account" to "View Extended Profile", plus "Edit" below my icon) is in teeny weeny eyestrain-o-vision on Firefox and IE for me.
Not a huge deal for me--I can read it--but it's certainly difficult for me to read.
Unfortunately, I don't use Gradation Vertical much, so I'm not exactly sure what looks off. A quick check looks to me like everything is in place, but I'm probably just missing what is obvious to me.
Which bits specifically look off, btw? Can you link me to an example / describe the specific bits?
I'm assuming since you were talking about it earlier that some of the code for the site schemes was changed/consolidated? I only ask because I'm experiencing some issues now with a custom-made skin I cobbled together from various css overrides using stylish and greasemonkey to change the the colours of the Tropo site scheme, which was working fine before the code push ._.a;;. I'm not really very crash hot at css to begin with so I wouldn't know where to even begin guessing at where/how to fix what got borked. I know it's not technically within DWidth's realm to field questions about this sort of thing because it's not really part of the site, but I figured I'd ask anyway. ._.b
Is it intentional that posts now look different in light format? There used to be a line between the bunch of buttons (previous entry, add to memories, etc) and the post but that's gone now. Also, I don't think the buttons were centered before. Is that intentional?
That happened deliberately, yes, as part of our project to unify the CSS being used to produce the various styles and make it look as similar as possible in all layouts.
Browser / operating system please? (They don't do that for me in any of my browsers, and nobody mentioned it in testing, so we'll need to know what you're looking at it in to test.)
Text enclosed in <q> tags no longer has quote marks at the beginning and end on site-schemed pages in Celerity. Was this intentional? (i.e. do I need to stop using them for quotes from an article?)
This is regarding the collapsible sections on the profile page. I recall that my preferences for which section(s) to collapse/hide and which section(s) to expand/show used to be saved.
But recently all of my sections remain expanded everytime I go to my profile page or someone else's.
I'd like someone to verify if this is how collapsible sections are supposed to work or not. I use Celerity and IE8.
I tried to reproduce your problem and failed. The collapsible sections are saved between page loads on every browser I tried. (Full disclosure: I don't have IE8, but I did try IE7 and it worked fine there.)
no subject
no subject
no subject
XMLRPC failure: Client error: Invalid text encoding: Cannot display this post. Please see http://www.livejournal.com/support/encodings.bml for more information.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
Not a huge deal for me--I can read it--but it's certainly difficult for me to read.
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
Which bits specifically look off, btw? Can you link me to an example / describe the specific bits?
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
The changes are somewhere in
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
But recently all of my sections remain expanded everytime I go to my profile page or someone else's.
I'd like someone to verify if this is how collapsible sections are supposed to work or not. I use Celerity and IE8.
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)