It made perfect sense to me, upon looking at the code in the LJ post. (Happened to me too.) Looks like the video I posted this time was video #5, right. So, in the corresponding entry on LJ, I got video #5 that I'd posted over there. Very simple and elegant.
I'm wondering if this isn't caused by running stuff through the HTML cleaner first, then crossposting, and if the order shouldn't be reversed somehow, though that would lead to its own bag of worms. (I may be very wrong.)
Re: You probably already have this one, but:
I'm wondering if this isn't caused by running stuff through the HTML cleaner first, then crossposting, and if the order shouldn't be reversed somehow, though that would lead to its own bag of worms. (I may be very wrong.)